This discussion contains some of the arguments used by clerics to bolster their position since halal or haram eating certain objects especially with regard to the type Haiwan. He just called and made a brief memorandum feet since referral sources.
Something that has been agreed upon by the scholars are: legal origin in all cases-except worship other kaedah have had to come-is the argument that showed unlawful.
It is based kaedah Fiqhiyyah: Case is unlawful what is forbidden by Allah and His Messenger thereof silenced when what is something unforgivable.
So even though the Quran has given guidance on how foods are unnecessary and should not be eaten.
i-Allah's Word:
"Hi all people, eat the lawful and good of what is on earth, and follow not Satan steps; kerana fact that Satan is an outright enemy to you" (al-Baqarah: 168)
ii-The Word of God Almighty:
"He justifies to them all that is good and forbids them evil things" (al-A'raf: 157)
Al-Quran has asserted that free food is lawful by God is good all other features. Indeed, it's food and kesihatan memudaratkan religion was forbidden and included in the al-khbai'th.
Matters that are forbidden:
1) carcass.
It is based on the word of Allah SWT:
Say: "Nor I get in the revelation revealed to me, things that are forbidden for people who want to eat it, unless the food is carrion, or blood flow or pork because it is dirty or indeed all animals slaughtered in the name of other than Allah. Whoever is in urgent situations is he does not want it and not (also) exceeds the limit, then surely your Lord is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. "(Al-An'am: 145)
Included in the category of the carcass is Haiwan:
1. were strangled or suffocated.
2. the Blaschke beaten with wooden or dihempap samada with something or struck.
3. Blaschke who fell or dropped from a high place, including those dumped into the cistern and for instance.
4. Blaschke headlong by the other animals.
5. Blaschke who eat other animals, even a well-trained hunting dog.
The evidence is the word of Allah:
"Forbidden to you (take) carrion, blood, pork, (meat Haiwan) were slaughtered in the name of other than Allah, the strangled, the beaten, the fall, the headlong, and were attacked by wild animals, except that you could kill it, and ( forbidden) are slaughtered for idols. And (also forbidden) raffle fate with arrows, (raffle luck with the arrow) is wickedness. "(Al-Mai'dah: 3)
Paragraph 3 of this surah al-Maidah everywhere exclude those who had slaughtered syar'ie while he's not dead.
2) Blood flowing.
The evidence is that the above verses.
Ibn Abbas was asked about the spleen, and he replied: "eat," and then they say, "it is the blood", he replied: "that is forbidden to you is the blood flowing."
3) Pig.
The evidence is that the above verses.
Those verses refer only meat, this causes a few people think other than pork such as bone and fat is halal. While that is valid: each derived from it is unclean and only the meat habit called kerana meat is eaten.
4) sacrifice to other than Allah.
The evidence is that the above verses.
That animal is mentioned the name of other than Allah during slaughter. Likewise sacrifices addressed to other than Allah, samada named or not during slaughter, even though recited bismillah. According to the author of Fath al-Majid fi Sharh Kitab al-Tawhid: "It's his deep sacrifices to idols (an-Nusb) showed reverence for taghut though not pronounced his name. So he called together with the sacrifices other than the name of Allah. If forbidden kerana called: "the name of the Messiah" and so on, then it is more memaksudnya hall for forbidden. The reason, aside from the worship of God is greater compared kekufurannya that appeal to other than Allah. By the way, if Haiwan is slaughtered for other than Allah as worship (taqarrub), is haraam even called bismillah.
5) All the fanged beast (As-Siba ').
Ibn al-Athir said: "namely predators that eat a pounce as: lions, tigers, wolves, and for instance. Prophet Muhammad:
"Everyone who has the fangs of a predator, it is haram to eat it." (Reported by Malik, Muslim and others from the hadith Abi al-Khusyani Tha'labah).
Al-Syafi'e holds that free as-Siba 'which is forbidden by humans such as lions, tigers and wolves. By that hyenas and civet are halal.
Abu Hanifah also found that free-carnivore is as shabu 'include: elephants, hyenas and cats. Everything is haram side.
Argument in relation to al-Syafi'e hyenas:
1. they are no fangs, otherwise all is the same sharp teeth.
2. If it is accepted that free has fangs, it is not from the category as-Siba 'mentioned in the hadith. This opinion dipersetujui by Ibn al-Qayyim.
3. Hadith Jabir. He asked about the hyena: Are hyenas game? The answer: yes. He asked again: is it accepted in those sayings of the prophet Muhammad? The answer: yes. (Reported by Abu Dawud, At-Tirmidhi and disahihkannya and an-Nasa-i and Ibn Majah. Validated also by al-Hakim).
6) All kinds of birds and grabbed a sharp hoof.
The evidence is the hadith of Ibn Abbas, he said:
"Prophet Muhammad forbade (eating) all the fangs of the beast and all the hoof (claw) of the bird." (Reported by Muslim)
As for what is meant by a bird that has nails are: the sharp nails used to capture prey and injure and tear. For example: Helang, hornbills, crows and kites. Excluded thereof: pigeons and small birds; kerana it was included in al-mustatob (cases that were considered good).
7. Ass and Himar Pelihraan:
Among the things which are forbidden by the Prophet in the battle of Khaibar is ass pet. (Reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim).
The word al-'Allamah Siddiq Hasan Khan: "Crowded among Arab people who have the instincts of a prosperous mengharamkannya and he saw the devil." Word of the Prophet Muhammad:
"When you hear the ass, then seek refuge in Allah from Satan; indeed he saw devils." (Reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim).
The scholars agreed on the halal wild ass-and-zebra and seladang. The Prophet SAW has been awarded a wild ass and the king ate it. (Reported by al-Bukhari from the Hadith Abi Qatadah).
8. Al-Jallalah (animals that eat dirt).
Namely animals that eat dirt and something disgusting. Ibn Hazm menghadkannya only to the four-legged while Ibn Hajar stated it is common. The evidence:
i-Hadith Ibn Umar:
Prophet Muhammad forbade al-jallalah of eating and drinking milk. (Reported by Ahmad, Abu Dawud, Ibn Majah and at-Tirmidhi who mensahihkannya).
ii-Hadith Ibn Abbas:
The ban is about eating and drinking al-jallalah milk. (Reported by Ahmad, Abu Dawud, at-Tirmidhi, an-Nasa-i, Ibn Majah, al-Hakim. Mensahihkannya At-Tirmidhi). Al-Hafiz said in al-Fath: it is the most valid in this chapter.
The word al-Albani: zahir hadith of Ibn Hazm's favor because of the milk called. Even though so, the scholars extend it to more general, as mentioned by Ibn Hajar.
The word al-Baghawi: "then the law of the animals that eat dirt, let see: if he just ate it occasionally, it is not al-jallalah; precisely unclean eaten like chicken and so on". Ibn Hazm said: "Abu Musa has valid that free chicken coop (aimed at cleaning food), if found to eat dirt".
Since it is the scholars differing opinions:
• Ahmad, ath-Thauri and al-Syafi'iyyah found al-jallalah eating is forbidden. This is confirmed by Daqiq Ibn al-'Eid.
• partly others state law is makruh other features.
The law takes Haiwan eat halal ingredients from pork.
1. Malik and partly cleric: meat and eggs should be eaten; kerana unclean food can be purified by istihalah (like a lock).
2. Opinions sebahagian others such as ath-Thauri, and Ahmad al-Syafi'e: forbidden to eat meat, eggs and milk.
3. Another opinion: if most of the food is unclean, then he is jallalah and should not be eaten. Conversely, if most of the food is not unclean, he may be eaten.
• Fixed Jawatankuasa Inquiry and Fatwa Saudi Arabia mentarjihkan opinion detailing the circumstances.
'Illah al-jallalah for prohibition is impurity. 'Illah that is changing the meat and milk from the haram halal. So if 'illat was lost in a way it is like a lock or a loss, lost his law by kaedah: By this, no more room for his deep mengharamkannya it is halal and haram because the original obstruction (unclean). If lost unclean, unclean missing.
This is a valid opinion sepertimana described by al-Hafiz in al-Fath and al-Albani. But no one had specified in the bracketing / clean beast is valid notwithstanding that free chicken coop Umar al-jallalah for 3 days. Siddiq Hasan Khan said: "he who alleges that free filthy still conserved, while the name and nature is gone, ought to reason".
9) Dogs and cats.
Almost no mistake among scholars about the history of prohibition dogs but Malik has revealed this view as kosher. Even though so, partly Malikiyyah scholars (especially mutaakhkhirin) menyanggahi view it. Prohibition dogs dating to several factors:
1. he is unclean by jumhur scholars; Prophet SAW that direction because the former were licked by dogs let the first be washed 7 times with groundwater. (Reported by Muslim).
2. it was included in the al-mustakhbath (perceived disgust), he ate dirt.
3. prohibition prophet SAW than eating dogs and cats price. (History as-valid).
Prohibition proposition cat also called on the hadith of Jabir: "Bahawasanya prophet SAW was banned from eating cats and price." (Reported by Abu Dawud, at-Tirmidhi and Ibn Majah, in this hadith isnad Muhammad Bin Zaid - da'eef).
Even though so, he reinforced with the same arguments about the prohibition of dogs on top.
According to scholars, there is no legal Beza among wild or tame cats, but one view of al-Syafi'yyah stating halal wildcat.
10) All types of animals are disgusting.
Allah SWT says:
"And he justifies to them all that is good and forbids them evil things" (al-A'raf: 157)
Most scholars provide guidelines in this regard are like the following:
1. What is considered disgusted and grossed out by human beings (pure nature) of the type Haiwan - not kerana something 'illah or kerana unusual â € "otherwise the sheer disgust his deep thought, then it is haram.
2. When people think of partly disgust while that is not, then the response is taken majoriti guess.
Even though so, al-Albani about their difficulties Padangan determine which of the busiest and she also involve a matter of culture and for instance. Thus, it argues, is the most appropriate: the contempt each side Personality 'it certainly would memudaratkan yourself and religious man.
Most Haiwan that are not eaten by humans while no proposition that clearly shows it haram, is Haiwan of this category.
11) All the animals were directed to be killed or banned from being murdered.
Sebilangan scholars have argued that free animals that are forbidden by the Prophet SAW of killed or driven to kill it is haram.
Animals were directed to kill:
Prophet Muhammad:
"From 'A'isha that free messenger SAW said: fawasiq all 5 types of animals should not be killed in the Land of Haram: the crow, sparrow, when jengking, rats, dogs, and al-' aqur (a type of animal that bit)." (Reported by al -Bukhari, Muslim, at-Tirmidhi and an-Nasai).
The animals are forbidden to kill:
Prophet Muhammad:
From Ibn Abbas, the Prophet Muhammad has forbidden that free instead of killing four kinds of animals: ants, bees, belatuk and parrots.
12) Animals that fish samada toxic or otherwise, hunted or found dead.
This is clearly forbids al-Islam kerana khabai'th. Also with a general paragraph:
"And spend (treasure bendamu) in the way of Allah, and make not your own hands into destruction, and do good, for Allah loves those who do good." (Al-Baqarah: 195)
13) Haiwan Life 2 nature:
The word al-Qadi Ibn al-'Arabi: a valid argument since Haiwan that live on land and water is prohibited; kerana percanggahan arguments are halal and haram. Then we won the argument haram as cautious step (ihtiyat).
While sebilangan scholars also argued that free all Haiwan who are living in the sea is lawful even though he may be living in the land unless there is another evident frog kerana berhubungnya.
14) Animals not status:
Namely animal not mentioned status, lawful or unlawful samada: Based on the words of the prophet Muhammad:
"What God halalkan in his book, it is halal. What God forbade, it haram. What does God let stand about him, then he is excused. "(Reported by al-Bazzar and said: sahih isnaad, also validated by al-Hakim).
Examples of animals that disputed law:
a) hedgehog:
- The mengharamkannya: Abu Hanifah and Ahmad
- The menghalalkannya: Malik and Syafi'e
Mengharamkannya proposition, is the hadith of Ibn Umar and Abu Daud Ahmad history. However isnad da'eef. By that rajih is: halal.
b) frog:
- The menghalalkannya: Malik
The evidence:
i-General of Allah:
"It is made lawful for you marine game and food (derived) from the sea as a delicious food for you, and for those on the way" (al-Maida: 96)
ii-General hadith about water and Haiwan carcasses in the ocean.
He (sea) holy water and kosher carcass. (Reported by Malik, al-Syafi'e and priests were four).
Both these general propositions about life / Haiwan at sea (water), and it covers the frog; kerana frogs belong to the category soidul bahr.
- The mengharamkannya: Ahmad
The evidence:
Abd Hadith. Rahman bin 'Uthman about a doctor asked the Prophet SAW on laws making frogs as ubat (to eat), then the prophet SAW banned from killing him. (Reported by al-Hakim validated. Sanadnya In no Sa'id Bin Khalid al-Qurtubi: didhaifkan by an-Nasai but dithiqahkan by Ibn Hibban and ad-Daraqutni word: he Madaniyy an argument may be made with it).
Indeed, if the prophet banned from frogs were killed, while the goal is to be an important as ubat, surely he should not be eaten sebarangan. Prohibition of eating too kerana surely he is unclean food. It kerana prophet SAW if banned from Haiwan kill something, then he may kerana dignity as human beings or illicit kerana eaten like a frog.
Ash-Syawkani anyway if they did not agree with animals being banned kaedah unlawful killing bererti eaten, because it is not clear to him. But the rajih are: frogs eat haram.
c) crocodile:
• the menghalalkannya: Malik, partly from Syafi'e and partly the other. It was included in the kerana soidul bahr. By then he would have been contained in the verse Surah al-Maida: 96 is.
• the mengharamkannya: Abu Hanifa and other partly. It kerana he belongs in the wild animals, and included in the category of star fanged beast.
Ibn Baz said: the problem is ijtihadiyyah and perbahasannya broad, but more ahwat (be careful) is to leave rather than eat it; take the form err guess next step guard circumvent the ban.
According to the view that free valid is haram to eat, kerana he also sits on land and have fangs, although he spent a long time in the water, but because the beginning was preceded law (land animals with fangs). Fiqh Ensaiklopedia Kuwait said that free forbidden crocodile and Hanbali schools of Syafie:
وللاستخباث في التمساح; ولأنه يتقوى بنابه ويأكل الناس.
"Kerana dirty alligator and he was really strong on the fangs and crocodiles eat people"
It certainly eat crocodile eggs are also forbidden.
d. Turtle - Animals who lived in the sea and also living in the land, no blunder among scholars. However, the animals that live in two worlds, his form among scholars err ', ternasuklah turtle. Said Dr Abdullah Faqih: -
أجاز العلماء أكل السلحفاة لعموم قوله تعالى: (كلوا مما في الأرض حلالا طيبا) وقوله أيضا (وقد فصل لكم ما حرم عليكم) وقالوا عن تذكية السلحفاة: ما يعيش في البر يذكي بلا خلاف في ذلك, وما يعيش في البر والبحر ككلب الماء والسلحفاة فاختلفوا فيه بين من قال بالتذكية, ومن لم يقل بها, والأولى التذكية خروجا من الخلاف.
"Scholars; justify eating turtle on general command of Allah: - (Eat of what is on earth lawful and good 2:168) and also his word (even though Allah has explained each one to you what ye Prohibition on 6:119) and they were talking about on turtles: what life on land, there is no dispute about it, and what on earth and the sea as water dogs and turtles mistake tersedapat among them, their recommenda said: Anybody who does not believe, once out of the reserved mula2 disputes "
Ibn Qudama rh. in al-Mughni said that free turtles be eaten if only slaughtered. He said:
كل ما يعيش في البر من دواب البحر, لا يحل بغير ذكاة, كطير الماء, والسلحفاة, وكلب الماء, إلا ما لا دم فيه, كالسرطان, فإنه يباح بغير ذكاة.
"All the animals living on land from the sea, it is not lawful without the slaughter, as well as seabirds, turtles, seals, but he did not bleed like crabs permitted without hamstrung"
Jumhur forbid animals that live two worlds. Although bagaimanapunkalangan scholars who hold to this view justify eating turtle eggs, turtle eggs, egg guided labi-labi also eggs. But they agreed to proscribe eating eggs kerana its poisonous snake.
e) hyenas and civet:
Have dealt before. Hyenas and civets are not included in the category as-Siba '(meals using canines). Imam as-Syafi'e holds that free as-Siba 'which is forbidden by humans such as lions, tigers and wolves with fangs. By that hyenas and civet are halal.
Abu Hanifah also found that free-carnivore is as shabu 'include: elephants, hyenas and cats. Everything is haram side.
Argument in relation to al-Syafi'e hyenas:
4. He no fangs, otherwise all is the same sharp teeth.
5. If it is accepted that free has fangs, it is not from the category as-Siba 'mentioned in the hadith. This opinion dipersetujui by Ibn al-Qayyim.
6. Hadith Jabir. He asked about the hyena: Are hyenas game? The answer: yes. He asked again: is it accepted in those sayings of the prophet Muhammad? The answer: yes. (Reported by Abu Dawud, At-Tirmidhi and disahihkannya and an-Nasa-i and Ibn Majah. Validated also by al-Hakim).
f) Snail Pig:
Snail pigs or in Arabic is called Halazun, scholars dispute about the law. Imam Malik and jurists Malikiyyah found that free barriy halazun (snails pigs) eat halal. (Al-Mudawwanah 1/542). When settled some scholars argue: He haram food. Whom Ibn Hazm in Muhalla (7/405).
In Morocco (Maghreb) Sibut adaah pork halal and made regular offerings to eat in most restaurants. It kerana most have bermazhab Maliki.
Snail Pig Morocco (Maghreb) The Permitted
Snail Gondang Malaysia
Snail Pig Malaysia
Snail Marghibi
Maybe Snail pigs in the Maghreb is not the same as Snail Pigs in Malaysia but rather like snails Gondang in Malaysia is lawful by most Ulamak.
This problem is ijtihadiyyah. For those who require it, they cling to the legal origin of all food is halal so there mengharamkannya passage. When the mengharamkannya found he was not Haiwan were slain, kerana no neck. So if he is dead, he is dead. But fish, grasshoppers, shrimp, crabs and snails are also not spared. It is halal to view Syafi'e School.
However, opinions were more ihtiyat (just in case) is mengharamkannya opinion. Allaah knows best. al-Ahkam.
In whole animals are eaten unclean:
1. Pengharamannya clear in the Qur'an or the al-Hadith.
2. Its Toxic
3. In the form poorly and winsome
4. Humans consuming
5. Eating using nails and fangs
6. Tearing the prey with a loud and ferocious
7. Who errs on the
8. Who lived two natural
Imam Syafi'e classify Haiwan or prohibition of these animals;
1. Who eat while flying
2. Are nested in holes in the ground
3. Living two worlds
4. The Bad face
5. The Beauty face
6. Who eat carrion
No comments:
Post a Comment